Letter to LSARA
August 7 2017As there are two sides to every story, the same can be said of the current RV situation. In 2005, we were looking for a property that we could use recreationally and eventually build and retire on. Prior to the purchase of our property, I called the county and spoke with a development officer. I explained our intentions and was advised that it was fine as long as we were not running a campground. We proceeded with our purchase and developed the land. If only I could turn back time and ask for that in writing.
Fast forward to 2009, when a neighbor reported to the county that we were running a campground and Lac St. Anne issued us a contravention order. Upon receipt of the letter I again spoke to a development officer at the county. Once again I was advised as long as we were not running a campground, there were no issues and the county closed the file. If no RV’s were allowed, that would have been a great time for the county to advise us of such – but that didn’t happen.
Fast forward to 2016, when the same neighbor again reported we were running a campground. This time we received a visit from bylaw. The bylaw officer advised that it was a new bylaw and regardless of what had happened in the past, we had to comply. When I asked about grandfathering, he advised that was not an option as RV’s were always discretionary use. Once again I placed a call to the county but this time, the development officer did confirm that only 1 RV was allowed. We were thoroughly shocked and immediately thrown into a mess.
I couldn’t understand how things could have gone so wrong! How could the county advise one thing, on more than one occasion and now do a complete about face? I began researching and reviewed council meetings minutes - the first mention of a recreational vehicle bylaw change that I could find was: July 9, 2015: Mr. Davidson – that County Council direct Administration to amend Bylaw #22-2015 to reflect that Recreational Vehicles will not be allowed in country residential and hamlet lots, in Lac Ste. Anne County, unless there is a primary residence constructed, and shall not be permitted for more than 72 hours without a special event permit approved by Lac Ste. Anne County Administration.
Does it even matter now what they told us? What the intent was? It is hard to watch articles posted that makes recreational users of properties look like disrespectful villains. I thought we had done our due diligence. I thought we had called and asked the right questions. I thought we did everything as we should have. Now we are in a position to abandon a property that we have loved and respected for 12 years. Could we try to sell it – of course we could however lots in our area have been for sale for literally…years. Our children have grown up here and we have created many memories, which now include with our grandchildren. We spend half our time in one county and half our time in another – am I any less of a resident in the county where I hold a permanent address?
Do RV families contribute to a “way of life”? I would ask if all permanent residents contribute to a “way of life”?
Are 100 RV’s in a subdivision too many? Of course it is but surely there is a better way to come to a solution that is fair and equitable to everyone. Perhaps limits should be a max of 1 RV per acre, must be removed from November to April, no renting of units, no RV’s in executive subdivisions…there are other solutions to consider.
Is it really so bad that someone at least maintains these properties and they are not overrun with weeds, garbage or worse – illicit activities? Is it really so bad that someone builds and lives in a garage package? What happened to the days when neighbors supported and respected each other? We have become a community where people are pitted against each other and where trespassing, adult bullying and discrimination appears to be completely acceptable. If a neighbor is driving too fast, talk to them. If a neighbor is playing music too loud, talk to them. Is the issue really what they sleep in at night?
If you have an Opinion or a Topic that concerns you please Email LSARA at lsaracares@gmail.com
Very well said, I couldn't agree more!
ReplyDeleteWe have a well cared for property, not visible from any direction by neighbors, fully treed, owned for nearly 20 years, we were also told it is complaint driven enforcement, so depending on who your neighbors are you can or can not have an RV property, This bylaw should be enforced based on the bylaw and not on if your neighbors are trouble makers. There are (full time) residents with disastrous looking, un-kept property's, bringing down the value of my property with a (legal) shack. As the bylaw reads vacant properties "could" have 4 RVs, but the county is denying that on Vacant land only.
It is a money grab the county tried with the $500 dollar a year permit, thankfully that was stopped, but the fee will be back at some point I am sure.
The elected new council should be honest and represent all when they are voted in.
The bylaw as it reads doesn't stop partying at all, it only prevents storage! Shouldn't people be penalized when they break a bylaw, like garbage, noise, classifying a RV as a special event, is a gross exaggeration, a RV on land bares no resemblance to a music festival.
This Bylaw is also singling out Vacant properties only, properties with a residence, with more than 1 RV (that they are allowed) are being told they can have up to 4 RVs un-permitted, This is in no way being fair to all. Why should acreages of the same size, in same subdivision be allowed 4 RVs with a building and vacant property's be allowed none. I think the homes with more than 1 RV can be a bigger eye sore than vacant land, depending on if you are a responsible owner.
We are very tired of the bizzare dealings of this council, not representing everyone at all. Hopeing for a change with new council but not holding my breath! We will likely sell and go to a county that treats all equally.