LSARA is a Not For Profit Association. We are all Ratepayers and Volunteers! The Ratepayers of Lac Ste. Anne County have made it clear that they want to be heard! LSARA is an important voice as we speak for a large number of people. 2500 people reading our blog posts in less than 24 hours tells us we are on the right track. IT'S A MATTER OF DOLLARS AND SENSE. 2023 Memberships are now available. $10 each or $20 per Family


Monday, September 10, 2018

Lac Ste. Anne County Rezoning for RV Use


“Mortgageability” And What It Means To You


WHY DOES THE ABILITY TO PLACE A MORTGAGE ON YOUR PROPERTY AFFECT YOUR RESALE VALUES?

You may not be aware that when you are applying for a mortgage, the property has to qualify just as much as you do. There can be many instances why a bank will not lend on a property, such as:

  • It is reaching the end of its economic life and the bank wants to know that the house will last longer than your 25 year mortgage.
  • The property may be a mobile home and the bank needs to know it is properly affixed to the foundation and to current building code standards, so it doesn’t “disappear” one day and they lose their security.It doesn’t have potable water or sewer/septic, or year round access.
  • The property could be in a state of excessive disrepair.
  • The home is smaller than the minimum square footage requirements for that lender.
  • The bank may not like the way the property is zoned.
Lenders will look a variety of criteria and you must hit every single one of their boxes in order for them to lend on the home. So why does a lender care about all these things?

Banks/lenders have to look at the risk they are taking - both for their shareholders and because the government mandates them to. If you are buying with less than 20% down payment, it is a law in Canada that your mortgage must be insured to protect the banks from any potential losses. There are 3 insurers in Canada. You pay the premium on this insurance and the bank is protected if they have to sell it at a loss during foreclosure. Some lenders will require you to have this insurance even if you have more than 20% down payment in order to protect themselves. And then there is a whole other conversation about bulk insurance that we won’t discuss. Mortgage insurance qualification is extremely important because the insurer can (and will) veto a bank’s pre-approval based on many variables. The ability to have this insurance also permits buyers to look at a home with less that 20% down payment.

It is extremely easy for a property to be devalued by more than 20%. A property is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. A home in bad condition or in a bad location can quickly lose value. For example, having a gas station built next to your home could cause the values to decrease. Or being on a busy road can also impact your values. Sometimes even minor cosmetic fixes can improve the value of your home. This is why it doesn’t take much to make a bank squirm and the banks are not in the business of losing money. They are concerned about hundreds of thousands of dollars being on the line in a single mortgage and whether they can quickly sell the home if needed.

Now let’s speak specifically about the zoning piece. The County of Lac Ste. Anne is wanting to rezone 17 or so subdivisions due to excessive non-conforming use within those neighborhoods. Non-conforming use is when property in the neighborhood is being used for purposes that are not allowed by the municipality’s bylaws. In this specific case, the non-conforming use is the use of vacant land to house multiple recreational vehicles for camping purposes without a permanent dwelling/house/cottage on the same land. Some people don’t want to live in a residential subdivision that is being utilized like a campground, so they won’t buy the home to raise their family. 

One of the insurers specifically said their concern is “these lots could end up being large camping-type sites and that limits the appeal for people wanting to buy regular homes in the area”.  So the proximity of lots being utilized exclusively by RV’s, to lots being used as homes, could affect the resale appeal of the home in their opinion.

At first the County wanted to call the zoning recreational. Very few banks will lend a mortgage on a house zoned recreational, and I did provide proof of that to my counsellor via bank policy manuals and email responses from the lenders. Now they are changing the zoning name to Rustic Residential to try and mitigate that risk for the residents who own homes in these neighborhoods. As a result, I canvassed the exact same lenders and most said they would treat it the same as recreational, because it is just a different name for recreational and the use is still the same. Some said they would only do it if it was insured. Well that was promising so I asked CMHC and Genworth if they would have a problem with the new zoning since I have had declines on this type of property zoning before. Both have advised that they have declined these types of “mixed use” subdivisions and will continue to do so as they become aware of them. Once a subdivision is “black-listed,” there is no going back. Every time a property in one of those postal codes is applied for - it will be manually checked to see if it is in one of those subdivisions.

So what does this mean for the houses that are already existing in these neighborhoods? If you have a single family dwelling and you have a buyer that qualifies no problem for the mortgage, they may still be declined because it is a “mixed use” subdivision. That buyer may be told by the bank that they need to put 25% or 35% down payment. Or maybe the bank isn’t interested at all and that buyer would need to pay cash. How much is your home worth if half the people who are interested cannot get financing?

This lack of available financing then causes a marketability spiral. Some people would still want to buy the home regardless but don’t have enough down payment (or don’t qualify at the only banks that offer the 35% down payment option). As prices drop, lenders become even more cautious and it then becomes a race to the bottom. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy, they don’t lend out of fear of declining property values, which in turns means less sales, which causes values to decline.

So then what? The young family who originally bought in a neighborhood that is no longer what they purchased into, and bought with 5% down payment may be in a position where they have to pay tens of thousands of dollars to sell. Why? Because property values have declined to a level where their mortgage is now higher than what they can sell their home for. Or they have to choose whether they continue to raise their family in a campground setting. 

Make no mistake- they purchased into a property zoned as a residential subdivision and that is being changed on them, through no fault of their own.

I don’t think most people realize that it is significantly harder to qualify for a mortgage these days than it was even 2, 5 or 10 years ago. Having a property that is virtually unmortgageable is certainly not going to help.

I have no alignment or agenda except that if I elect to keep my home (which is my primary residence, not my 2nd home and yes it is in one of these neighborhoods), I have been told to expect a significant decline in values. I can’t and won’t set myself back that much financially. My agenda is that the people who live by me - need to know the ramifications of what is going to happen to their equity if they stay. I didn’t even think about this until I was trying to finance a property at Pigeon Lake and it was declined for being too “recreational” even though it wasn’t zoned recreational. 

Council needs to know what they are knowingly doing to young families who reside in this County. The “Recreational County” as they called it at the last Information Meeting. That slogan won’t raise any red flags with insurers…(sarcasm).

I can tell you, many residents in our subdivision have lodged complaints about the non-conformance issues for the last 4-5 years. Everyone has their own reason based on the specific challenges they have faced. This isn’t a new problem, it is an escalating problem. We have incurred considerable expense to appeal this type of use at SDAB hearings and nothing has changed. This is the Council’s and Administration’s agenda. Every subdivision within that list of 17, will be painted with the same brush.

Everyone has a different opinion. Some subdivisions are OK with the proposed rezoning and some are not. And at the end of the day - that is also OK. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and everyone should be heard.

I wish you all well in whatever decisions you need to make about your homes, where you reside, and what this will mean for you personally. But as an owner of property in the County of Lac Ste. Anne - you now know more about mortgages than 80% of the population, and we haven’t even scratched the surface.



LSAC COUNCILLORS     LET THEM KNOW HOW YOU FEEL

Joe Blakeman | Reeve, Councillor, Division 5
Email jblakeman@lsac.ca Ph. 780 918-1916

Lorne Olsvik | Councillor, Div. 1
Email lolsvik@lsac.ca Ph. 780 937-5360

Nick Gelych | Councillor, Div.2
Email ngelych@lsac.ca Ph. 780 9039393

George Vaughan | Councillor, Div. 3
Email gvaughan@lsac.ca Ph. 780 967-3469

Steve Hoyda | Councillor, Div. 4
Email shoyda@lsac.ca Ph. 780 674-8080

Ross Bohnet | Councillor, Div. 6
Email rbohnet@lsac.ca Ph. 780 786-4290

Lloyd Giebelhaus | Councillor, Div. 7

Email lgiebelhaus@lsac.ca Ph. 780 785-2095






3 comments:

  1. I had warned of this, and brought it to the attention of LSARA in a number of the early meetings, only to fall on deaf ears. Nobody seemed to care, the only attention LSARA paid was to a building that had already been built, and nothing about that was going to change. So here we are in 2018, and once again the County is going to screw the actual people that live in, and have invested in the County. Now, they will find their property, and for many their retirement income, devalued and extremely difficult to sell. I for one would never have invested if I had known my subdivision was going to become a campground. LSARA really missed the boat on this issue. Since this RV threat I haven't spent a single dollar in the County, to improve my property, and add value. Why would I. So now this will morf itself into a tax fight, another unsavoury process in a continuous battle with Mr. Primeau and his toady Council. Take a look at your subdivision, even if it gets by this round of stupidity remember, Council can change it at any time. But also keep in mind, they are going to grandfather the RV owners rights, and this can never be changed. A shame they couldn't have grandfathered the home owners rights to live in a proper subdivision.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just to inform you, LSARA followed this LUB rewrite very closely, attended most of their public open houses and addressed possible conflict and issues that these changes pose. I believe we did a lot of informative posts and spent a lot of time investigating and asking questions. We encouraged all ratepayers to pay attention and voice their concerns as well. So although you feel your concerns fell on deaf ears know we have always strived to stay on top of current issues.

      Delete
  2. This is a very important article that provides information that the subject matter experts have collected on our behalf. If you own land in LSAC, it is very important that you inform yourself and understand that grandfathering bylaws that are already in contravention of land use bylaws cannot happen. My property value is important to me as should yours be to you .

    ReplyDelete

Lac Ste. Anne Ratepayers Association Facebook

Please Join! We need your support.

Please Join! We need your support.

Please Inc.Ph#, Address, Legal Land Description, Division# of Each Member in the "Message" section.

Name

Email *

Message *

Payment for membership can be made via e-transfer to lsaracares@gmail.com

Payment for membership can be made via e-transfer to lsaracares@gmail.com

GET TO KNOW YOUR LSAC COUNCILLOR LET THEM KNOW HOW YOU FEEL

Joe Blakeman | Reeve, Councillor, Division 5

Email jblakeman@lsac.ca Ph. 780 918-1916


Lorne Olsvik | Councillor, Div. 1

Email lolsvik@lsac.ca Ph. 780 937-5360


Nick Gelych | Councillor, Div.2

Email ngelych@lsac.ca Ph. 780 9039393


George Vaughan | Councillor, Div. 3

Email gvaughan@lsac.ca Ph. 780 967-3469


Keven Lovich | Councillor, Div. 4

Email klovich@lsac.ca Ph. 780 785-8153


Ross Bohnet | Councillor, Div. 6

Email rbohnet@lsac.ca Ph. 780 786-4290


Lloyd Giebelhaus | Councillor, Div. 7

Email lgiebelhaus@lsac.ca Ph. 780 785-2095

WE WANT YOUR OPINIONS

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

RECENT COMMENTS ...... Please leave your comments on any of our posts. YOUR VALUED OPINION MATTERS!

CURRENT NEWS

LESS PROVINCIAL FUNDING FOR RURAL LAC STE. ANNE COUNTY How does this affect your LSAC Tax Bill?

WHAT THEY TOLD YOU THEN and WHAT THEY SAY NOW

IN CAMERA

FLUFF OR TRANSPARENCY

WHAT ARE THE COUNCILLORS DUTIES

WHAT ARE THE COUNCILLORS DUTIES
COUNCILLORS RESPONSIBILITIES

Alberta Government Municipal Affairs

View Our Current Top Priority Issues

LSARA. Powered by Blogger.

LSAC ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

LSAC ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
CLICK TO VIEW THE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Welcome to the Lac Ste. Anne and Communities Ratepayers Association Web Site and Blog. The association will be a positive and credible advocate of Lac Ste. Anne County Communities. It will, by coordinated input, oversee that elected county officials are held to the terms and conditions of provincial laws and regulations. It will continuously strive to work for the betterment of all ratepayers. IT'S A MATTER OF DOLLARS AND SENSE.

THIS IS OUR COUNTY